How law firms can use data to differentiate their pitch

2 April 2024

A few years ago, our founder Jason Ku, used data to select a law firm to work with (for those of you who know him this will come as no surprise). We thought there were some interesting parallels with what GCs are looking for when picking firms to work with, so we've broken down his approach and highlighted the key learnings for law firms.

Why does this apply to law firms?

Clients are becoming more analytical when it comes to selecting firms to work with. Therefore, there's a great opportunity for law firms to

take a data-driven approach to highlighting their offering.


As more and more clients look to access data when making their decisions, if your firm isn't providing it then your rival firms might be instead. Using tools like Pirical Legal Professionals (PLP), you can analyze how your firm's offering differs from the competition and strategically emphasize your key strengths.

How Jason used data to pick a law firm

For context, Jason was looking for an immigration lawyer and reached out to several firms. He received nearly identical proposals from 3, all offering the same kind of generic service and quoting a similar price (within 5% of each other).

After price negotiations he ended up with 3 different options

Firm 1

Agreed to a 10% discount

Firm 2

Agreed to a 15% discount

Firm 3

Agreed to a 30% discount

But why would 3 firms with similar offerings accept different fees? And more importantly, which one should he pick to work with?

Using Pirical Legal Professionals (PLP), our legal market research tool which collects public data of almost 600,000 lawyers globally, Jason started to dig into the market and the 3 law firms he was considering working with.

He looked into the organization structures of each firm

Data snapshot infographic

Each one had a very different structure, which meant he was able to make some expectations around each firm's offering and make his final decision

Firm 1

Top-heavy


Premium priced service driven by expertise for difficult matters

Firm 2

Well-balanced


Flexible full-service for different needs

Firm 3

Light on Partners


Lower-cost offering for common immigration issues

Differentiating their services relative to the competition would have influenced Jason to make a different choice

Had any of the firms highlighted their specific strengths at the beginning of the process, Jason's choice could have been much simpler.

Firm 1

Top-heavy


"We have deep expertise in complex issues that our competitors can’t match. You will get personal service directly from our Partners who will work closely with you."

Firm 2

Well-balanced


"We are well-balanced to ensure we can optimally meet your different needs. As your business grows, you will have different needs, which we can handle."

Firm 3

Light on Partners


"We offer a cost-effective solution to your legal requirements, while maintaining a high level of service."

Using Pirical Legal Professionals (PLP) to differentiate your offering

Benchmark your firm's strength against competitors

Understand the opposite team’s size, seniority split, legal rankings, tenure, previous clients, and their firm’s strength in associated practice areas.


Examples from PLP users:

  • Identified that the opposing team had a high proportion of Junior Partners (6-9 years experience) compared to their more senior & experienced Partnership team
  • Discovered that the rival team had more Partners who were listed in both New York City and London, but these same Partners seemed to be primarily based in London. When pitching for New York work, the rival firm was inflating their bench size numbers
Data snapshot infographic

Showcase the dimensions where your firm shines

Identify which KPIs make your firm stand out: financials, headcount growth, diversity representation, attrition rates, national or global presence, etc.


Examples from PLP users:

  • Identified that their firm's IP practice had 3 more Partners than their competitor's
  • Discovered that the other firm didn't have a strong Antitrust practice while pitching for M&A work
  • Emphasized their firm's strong retention rate and stressed the continuity of service the client would receive
  • Highlighted the diversity of the team pitching for work relative to the market
Data snapshot infographic

Research the Partners you're up against

Leverage a network of 10 million+ legal connections to identify who at your firm can share intel on teams pitching for the same work or RFP.

Data snapshot infographic

Data collected using Pirical Legal Professionals (PLP)

Global attorney database built with the most comprehensive sources of data on the market. Designed for law firm lateral hiring teams, legal headhunters, BD & Marketing professionals and strategy planners, our data tracks over 580,000 profiles across 130+ countries. PLP enables firms to source talent quicker, leverage their own network for referral opportunities, map out competitors’ org structures and research new markets.

Try PLP for 1 hour

Subscribe to the latest data insights & blog updates



Fresh, original content for Law Firms and Legal Recruiters interested in data, diversity & inclusion, legal market insights, recruitment, and legal practice management.

Get updates via email
A green map of the united kingdom on a white background.
11 June 2025
London dominates much of the UK's legal landscape but other legal hubs play a significant role and some are even growing at a faster rate. We've taken a closer look at the current distribution of the UK's top lawyers, which markets have been growing the fastest, and how large a presence US firms now have in the UK. Using publicly-available data tracked by Pirical Legal Professionals (PLP) , here's a snapshot of the UK legal market in 2025.
Photo from Pirical Pioneers 2025
20 May 2025
Last week, Pirical celebrated a decade of innovation at our biggest Pirical Pioneers event to date! We brought together a fantastic crowd of Recruitment, Strategy, HR & DEI leaders for some insightful panel discussions and previews of our latest tools & new features.
McDermott's office growth post-merger
9 May 2025
Yesterday, McDermott Will & Emery and Schulte Roth & Zabel announced their plans to merge. The combination would create a law firm of around 1,600 attorneys and $2.8 billion of revenue. The merged firm would rank in the top 20 of the AM Law 100. If approved, the merger would unite McDermott's broad expertise in healthcare, dispute resolution, and corporate law with Schulte's deep focus on hedge funds, private capital, and financial regulation. This latest announcement follows in the footsteps of other recent combinations like Herbert Smith Freehills & Kramer Levin and Troutman Pepper & Locke Lord . Using publicly-available data tracked by Pirical Legal Professionals (PLP) , we've taken a look at which locations & practices would grow under the merger.
US attorney headcount by city
6 May 2025
Which US states and cities have the highest number of attorneys, which practice areas are the most prominent and which firms are leading the market with the highest Partner headcount
Lateral Partner demand in certain practices shifted across different segments of the AM Law 200
30 January 2025
Using publicly-available data from Pirical Legal Professionals (PLP), we've taken a look at the lateral Partner hires and headcount growth from 2024 to see which law firms and practices had the most interesting growth stories of the year.
Change in size of Partner promotions class
12 December 2024
As we near the end of the year, there have been a flurry of Partner promotion announcements from the top AM Law firms. Overall, the promotion class sizes have decreased for the second year in a row.
More posts