What's Hot and What's Not? Practice Growth in the AM Law Second Hundred

7 November 2024
Bar graph showing top growing and declining practices by city in the United States from 2019-2021.

Not long ago, we looked at practice area growth among the AM Law 100 and found some interesting trends. Cybersecurity and Corporate work led the way with the highest increases in Partner headcount, while various Litigation practices saw sharp decreases in Partner numbers.


So now comes the turn of the AM Law 101-200! Using data from Pirical Legal Professionals (PLP), we've taken a look at Partner headcount growth by practice between 2019-2024 to reveal which practices are on the up and which have been shrinking.


Practices that have been growing 📈

What's hot? Top 30 growing practices in the AM Law 101-200

Litigation work is fundamental to the AM Law second hundred

Across the AM Law 200 more Partners work in Litigation than any other practice group. For firms ranked 101-200, Litigation represents the primary practice group of 42% of Partners and accounts for almost half of the top growing practices listed above.


In particular, Partner headcount has increased in Employment Litigation and IP Litigation practices across multiple locations.

AM Law divide

Government Law and Private Client work are focuses of growth for second hundred firms, but not the AM Law 100

Two of the AM Law 101-200's highest growth practice groups make up some of the lowest growth areas among AM Law 100 firms.


The clear practice area in common across both halves of the AM Law 200 is Cybersecurity, Privacy & Data Protection, where Partner headcount has grown significantly for the top 100 (+36%) and the second hundred (+34%).

Chart showing practice groups with highest growth from 2018-2024, highlighting Corporate & Public Health Law and Defense Law, green bars.

AM Law divide

California has been a focus of growth for AM Law 101-200 firms but has seen relatively low growth among the top  100

Across San Diego, San Francisco and Los Angeles, Partner headcount among second hundred firms has grown by +32% since 2019, compared to just +11% for AM Law 100 firms. Litigation work and a handful of firms growing aggressively (such as Buchalter, Fisher Philips and Fennermore Craig) has driven this West Coast increase.


Back in May, our analysis of practice growth among the AM Law 100 found that California had experienced relatively low growth, partly driven by a decline in some Litigation practices.

Bar graph: Highest partner headcount growth by city in the United States, 2010-2014. Philadelphia shows the highest growth.

Practices that have been shrinking 📉

What's not? Top 30 declining practices in the AM Law 101-200

Product Liability is the most common declining practice area

The practice has decreased in headcount across multiple cities since 2019, with a number of firms losing Partners to bigger rivals. Most notably, AM Law 100 firm Nelson Mullins has poached Product Liability Partners from several second hundred firms in recent years, including Tucker Ellis, Lathrop GPM and Benesch.

AM Law divide

The AM Law 100 are growing in Regulatory & Compliance, Corporate and International Trade more than firms ranked 101-200

Several of the AM Law 101-200’s lowest growth practice groups make up some of the highest growth areas among top 100 firms.


The gulf in Corporate work is particularly stark, the AM Law 100 has increased Partner numbers in Corporate practices by over 1,600 since 2019, compared to a headcount rise of just 167 Partners among the second hundred. Currently, Corporate is the primary practice group of 20% of AM Law 100 Partners and 10% of 101-200 Partners.

Chart showing practice groups with lowest growth, green bars indicate growth percentage.

Detroit, Phoenix and a few Midwestern cities have seen decreases in Partner headcount

Detroit based law firms Honigman and Dickinson Wright account for a significant number of the Partner departures there. While Dickinson Wright again, makes up much of the decline in headcount in Phoenix, alongside Quarles & Brady.

Bar graph showing lowest partner headcount growth by city in the US from 2010-2014. Detroit has the lowest growth, Boston the highest.

Note on methodology

Source: Pirical Legal Professionals, using publicly available data

Timeframe: Jan 2019 - Sep 2024

Includes practices with more than 15 Partners and attributes 1 primary practice per Partner

Includes cities with more than 200 Partners and attorneys with multiple locations have been equally distributed across each

Written using data from Pirical Legal Professionals (PLP)

Unlock unparalleled coverage of the legal market


Global attorney database built with the most comprehensive sources of data on the market. Designed for law firm lateral hiring teams, legal headhunters and strategy planners, our data tracks over 610,000 profiles across 130+ countries. PLP enables firms to source talent quicker, leverage their own network for referral opportunities, map out competitors’ org structures, research new markets and much more.

Try PLP for 1 hour

Subscribe to the latest data insights & blog updates



Fresh, original content for Law Firms and Legal Recruiters interested in data, diversity & inclusion, legal market insights, recruitment, and legal practice management.

Get updates via email
Bar chart showing percentage headcount change in PE practices from Jan 2021 to Jan 2022 across eight global law firms.
by Craig Savitzky 14 April 2026
Pirical data tracking 50,000+ lawyers across PE and capital markets practices reveals a three-year talent reshaping more dramatic than the numbers indicate.
A table listing the top 14 Law Firms in the AM Law 101-200 by growth in Partner headcount
by Emily Turner 9 April 2026
See Pirical's Ranking of Which AM Law 101-200 Law Firms Have Seen the Most Significant Growth in the Past Year
A line graph titled
8 April 2026
Pirical has been working with customers to diagnose their current state of productivity and to test ideas about what really drives productivity across the market.
by Lakshana Susinthiran 7 April 2026
Lateral Partner retention is a vital metric for law firms. "Each year, law firms invest countless hours, money, and resources in their lateral hiring efforts" , so the success rate of each lateral hire has significant implications to any firm. Based on input from a number of firms, a key window for a lateral Partner hire is the first 3 years from joining. Within that timeframe, most firms will have a sense of whether the hire is going to be a success, or not! Using publicly-available data tracked by Pirical , we've analyzed how many of the lateral Partner hires made by AM Law 100 firms between 2020-2022 exited the firm within 3 years of joining.
Chart of top 50 lateral hiring over time, increasing trend from Jan 2023 to Jan 2026. Green bars.
by Emily Turner 31 March 2026
The Volume of Lateral Moves From AM Law 1-50 to 101-150 Firms has Increased by +45% Over the Last 3 Years.
Table showing a list of names with corresponding numbers in two columns labeled
by Craig Savitzky 10 March 2026
Which law firms had already positioned themselves years earlier to capture what may become the largest energy legal market since post-invasion Iraq?