Protecting Personal Diversity Data during Reporting and Analysis

Bella Lagrange • 8 March 2023

POD features a protective mechanism to avoid accidental disclosure of sensitive personal data. It is called small-group masking.

What is the risk?

When a group is too small, it is easier to infer who the data refers to. This could result in accidental identification of an individual and their diversity trait. Most POD users won’t be authorised to see personal data at an individual level, only aggregated data.

 

What does small-group masking look like in POD?

 When a total headcount is too low, the number will be hidden and represented by <k.

 

What determines the minimum threshold, k?

When Pirical on Demand is set up for your firm, you can choose a minimum threshold. Most firms choose a minimum of 3. If <k appears, it means that the number of people is less than the agreed threshold.


For example, if it is decided that k=4 then any number less than 4 will be hidden.

What if <k shows as the total?

If <k appears in the total column it is because a headcount, <k, is a part of that total. If the total was revealed, then the value of <k could be determined.

Does this apply to all diversity traits?

 Small-group masking is applied to all diversity traits in POD.

 

What if a screen I want to see is k-masked? Is there a way around it?

An admin on your account may be able to authorise a special cut of the data.  Please discuss with your POD account manager.


Subscribe to the latest data insights & blog updates



Fresh, original content for Law Firms and Legal Recruiters interested in data, diversity & inclusion, legal market insights, recruitment, and legal practice management.

Get updates via email
Bar chart showing percentage headcount change in PE practices from Jan 2021 to Jan 2022 across eight global law firms.
by Craig Savitzky 14 April 2026
Pirical data tracking 50,000+ lawyers across PE and capital markets practices reveals a three-year talent reshaping more dramatic than the numbers indicate.
A table listing the top 14 Law Firms in the AM Law 101-200 by growth in Partner headcount
by Emily Turner 9 April 2026
See Pirical's Ranking of Which AM Law 101-200 Law Firms Have Seen the Most Significant Growth in the Past Year
A line graph titled
8 April 2026
Pirical has been working with customers to diagnose their current state of productivity and to test ideas about what really drives productivity across the market.
by Lakshana Susinthiran 7 April 2026
Lateral Partner retention is a vital metric for law firms. "Each year, law firms invest countless hours, money, and resources in their lateral hiring efforts" , so the success rate of each lateral hire has significant implications to any firm. Based on input from a number of firms, a key window for a lateral Partner hire is the first 3 years from joining. Within that timeframe, most firms will have a sense of whether the hire is going to be a success, or not! Using publicly-available data tracked by Pirical , we've analyzed how many of the lateral Partner hires made by AM Law 100 firms between 2020-2022 exited the firm within 3 years of joining.
Chart of top 50 lateral hiring over time, increasing trend from Jan 2023 to Jan 2026. Green bars.
by Emily Turner 31 March 2026
The Volume of Lateral Moves From AM Law 1-50 to 101-150 Firms has Increased by +45% Over the Last 3 Years.
Table showing a list of names with corresponding numbers in two columns labeled
by Craig Savitzky 10 March 2026
Which law firms had already positioned themselves years earlier to capture what may become the largest energy legal market since post-invasion Iraq?