People Analytics demystified — Part 1: 12-month Trailing Averages

7 March 2019

This is the first in a series of posts requested by clients on demystifying concepts in people analytics. It is intended to introduce analytical concepts to those without a mathematical or statistical background, in a way that is both intuitive and immediately useful. We hope it will lead to people asking more questions about analytics and pausing to consider implications of analyses they see in their day-to-day work.

If you want to get the entire series over the next few weeks comfortably in your inbox, sign up to our newsletter .

This week’s concept is 12-month Trailing Averages. Let’s jump right in.

12-month Trailing Averages

Say, you want to know if your company’s headcount has been growing over time.  What’s the best way to present this figure?

You can look at the number of employees you have at the end of each month.  Figure 1 is an example.

Figure 1: Monthly headcount

If you look at the number on Jan. 2019 (1,498), it is significantly higher than it was in Dec. 2018 (1,306). In fact, we can make the observation that Jan. of every year shows a higher number than the preceding Dec. This is likely due to the seasonality effect - people leave their work towards the end of the year, take some time for themselves over the holiday season, then begin a new job in the new year.

Given this pattern, it would be misleading to use monthly headcount figures to conclude if your company has been growing. If you reported the number in Jan., it would seem your company is growing; however, if you reported the Dec. number, it would seem your company is shrinking.

Since the seasonality effect is an annual one, one alternative is to report the average annual figure over 2018. This would take into account figures for a full season. While this would remove the seasonality effect, reporting annual averages would also mean you won’t get an update for a full 12 months.  

What else could we do?

One answer is to use 12-month trailing averages.

Why are they called “trailing”? Picture a plane’s condensation trails — it trails the plane’s journey.

In keeping with this mental image, a “12-month trailing average” is the average of the previous 12 months.  For example, Dec. 2018 is the average of Jan. 2018 to Dec. 2018. Jan. 2019 is the average of Feb. 2018 to Jan. 2019, etc.  

Figure 2: How to calculate a 12-month trailing average

The 12-month trailing average figure for any given month takes into account a full year of data, removing the effect of seasonality, while still giving you monthly figures to act on any observed patterns.  This is what a 12-month trailing monthly average of our data would look like:

Figure 3: Yearly trailing averages, calculated each month

The company is consistently growing in headcount.

Conclusion

When you want to show monthly stats for a figure that is affected by seasonality, use 12-month trailing averages.

Sign up here to get notified when we publish a new post.

Subscribe to the latest data insights & blog updates



Fresh, original content for Law Firms and Legal Recruiters interested in data, diversity & inclusion, legal market insights, recruitment, and legal practice management.

Get updates via email
A green map of the united kingdom on a white background.
11 June 2025
London dominates much of the UK's legal landscape but other legal hubs play a significant role and some are even growing at a faster rate. We've taken a closer look at the current distribution of the UK's top lawyers, which markets have been growing the fastest, and how large a presence US firms now have in the UK. Using publicly-available data tracked by Pirical Legal Professionals (PLP) , here's a snapshot of the UK legal market in 2025.
Photo from Pirical Pioneers 2025
20 May 2025
Last week, Pirical celebrated a decade of innovation at our biggest Pirical Pioneers event to date! We brought together a fantastic crowd of Recruitment, Strategy, HR & DEI leaders for some insightful panel discussions and previews of our latest tools & new features.
McDermott's office growth post-merger
9 May 2025
Yesterday, McDermott Will & Emery and Schulte Roth & Zabel announced their plans to merge. The combination would create a law firm of around 1,600 attorneys and $2.8 billion of revenue. The merged firm would rank in the top 20 of the AM Law 100. If approved, the merger would unite McDermott's broad expertise in healthcare, dispute resolution, and corporate law with Schulte's deep focus on hedge funds, private capital, and financial regulation. This latest announcement follows in the footsteps of other recent combinations like Herbert Smith Freehills & Kramer Levin and Troutman Pepper & Locke Lord . Using publicly-available data tracked by Pirical Legal Professionals (PLP) , we've taken a look at which locations & practices would grow under the merger.
US attorney headcount by city
6 May 2025
Which US states and cities have the highest number of attorneys, which practice areas are the most prominent and which firms are leading the market with the highest Partner headcount
Lateral Partner demand in certain practices shifted across different segments of the AM Law 200
30 January 2025
Using publicly-available data from Pirical Legal Professionals (PLP), we've taken a look at the lateral Partner hires and headcount growth from 2024 to see which law firms and practices had the most interesting growth stories of the year.
Change in size of Partner promotions class
12 December 2024
As we near the end of the year, there have been a flurry of Partner promotion announcements from the top AM Law firms. Overall, the promotion class sizes have decreased for the second year in a row.
More posts